Goodwin, Roentgen. Gaines, S.. (2004). Matchmaking viewpoints and you can relationships quality across societies: nation because an excellent moderator regarding dysfunctional viewpoints and you can loved ones quality in about three former communist countries. Private Matchmaking, 11,267-279.
Hamamci, Z. Buyukozturk, S. (2004). The brand new Interpersonal Intellectual Distortions Level: growth of the dimensions and you can investigation of its psychometric functions, Psychological Accounts, 95, 291-303.
Hoyer, J., Fecht, J., Louterback, W., Schneider, Roentgen. (2001). Changes in argument, symptoms and you can well being during psychodynamic and you may intellectual behavioral treatment alcoholic beverages inpatient procedures. Therapy and you will Psychosomatic, 70, 209-216.
Kaner, S.(2000). Kontrol kuramna dayal anne baba ergen iliflkileri olce i gelifltirme califlmasi (The analysis out-of development of moms and dad-adolescent family relations scale based on control idea). Ankara Universitesi Elizabeth itim Bilimleri Fakultesi Dergisi, 33, 67-75.
Lolonde, R., Hynie, Meters., Pannu, Meters. Tatla, S. (2004). This new part of people when you look at the social family relations. Log away from Mix-Cultural Mindset, thirty five, 503-524.
A lot of time, Elizabeth. S. Adams, C.(2001). Mediation out of parent-adolescent disagreement courtesy mixture of troubleshooting interaction knowledge and you can behavioural exchange. Kid Family relations Decisions Treatment, 23, 1-17.
Relationships values, social effect and you can relationships improvement
Metts. S. Cupach. W. Roentgen. (1990). This new determine away from family viewpoints and problem solving responses to the pleasure for the personal relationship. Individual Communications Research, 17, 170-185.
Muller, An excellent.T., Rabe, H.M. Nortje, C. (2001). Impaired opinions and you can marital conflict for the disturb and nondistressed hitched somebody. Log away from Intellectual-Emotive Cognitive Choices Therapy, 19, 259-270.
Moller, A good. T. Van der Merwe, J. D. (1997). Unreasonable viewpoints, social effect and you may marital modifications. Diary off Rational emotive and you will Intellectual Behavioural Cures, fifteen, 260-290.
Openshaw, O. K., Mills, T. A great., Adams, Grams. Durso, D. D. (1992). Dispute resolution into the mother or father-teenage dyads. Record from Adolescent Lookup, 7, 457-468.
Recepov, Roentgen. (2000). Algilanan anne baba davranislari:kulturlerarasi bir karflilaflirma. (Understood adult choices: a mix-cultural study) Yaynlanmams Doktora Tezi (Unpublished doctorate dissertation) Ankara Univeristesi.
Reed, J. S. Dubow, Age. F. (1997). Intellectual and you may behavioural predictors from communications into the scientific introduced and you can nonclinical introduced mom-teenage dyads. Journal out-of ily, 59, 91-102.
Robin, A great. L., Patrica, S. Moye, Good. (1995). Family relations rather than individual cures having anorexia: impact on friends conflict. Globally Record of Food Disorders, 17,313-323.
Robin, A good., Koepke, T. Moye, A beneficial. (1990). Multidimensional evaluation of mother or father-adolescent connections. Pyshological Investigations: Record off Consulting and you can Scientific Mindset, dos, 451-459.
Shi, L. (2003). The connection anywhere between adult connection styles and you will dispute quality for the intimate products. American Log off Loved ones Therapy, 29,143-157.
Sinclair, S. L. Nelson, Elizabeth. S. (1998). The brand new perception out-of parental splitting up toward college or university students’ sexual relationhips and you can relationships thinking. Record of Divorce proceedings Remarriage, 30,103-129.
Smith, B.Grams. Schwebel, A beneficial. We. (1995). Having fun with a cognitive behavioral friends design during the conily treatment patterns. American Record out of Members of the family Therapy, 23, 203-211.
Stackert, Roentgen. Bursik, K (2003). As to the reasons was We unsatisfied? Adult connection however, gendered irrational dating opinions, and you will young mature connection satisfaction. Identity and Personal Distinctions, 34, 1419-1429.
Vincent-Roehling, P. Robin, An effective. L. (1986). Advancement and you will validation off Family members Thinking Catalog: a way of measuring unrealistic opinions certainly mothers and you can adolescents. Journal out of Counseling and you may Systematic Mindset, 54, 693-697.
Dysfunctional relationship beliefs can also be associated with how somebody work to help you argument within dating
Particularly, this new beliefs one to “Anyone else should become aware of the things i imagine although I actually do maybe not let you know my personal viewpoint” or “I’m what they imagine no matter if people do not inform you” based on notice studying can get prevent individuals’ away from stepping into thinking-disclosure from private feelings and thoughts throughout the state and you may beginning dialogue regarding problems in their relationships. If the individuals believe that should they do not talk towards situation, the connection tend to endure. They you will need to end dispute, for that reason they won’t arrived at provider within their relationships (Kayser Himle, 1994). Having said that, when individuals keep instance cognition because the “relationships are not constantly best, disagreement inevitable when people work together”, capable correspond with companion and you can resolve disease (Sullivan Schwebel, 1995).
The try out of research is 372 college students learning in two various other universities for the Poultry (248 lady and you can 124 guys). The fresh suggest age of the participants try many years (SD = dos.39), start from 17 to help you thirty-two. Of those college students, 60 (16 %) was reading in the first seasons, 169 (45.6%) were discovering in the next season regarding college, twenty two (5.9 %) was basically learning from the 3rd 12 months off college or university, 121 (thirty two.6 %) off new member are the fresh new fourth year off college or university.
Table 1 merchandise the brand new function and you may simple deviations regarding ICDS, MRS, FRS and CRS complete and subscales for each organizations. The latest imply thinking out-of complete groups for ICDS (M = SD= 9.23) showed that participants recommended low level of irrational relationships beliefs. The averages scores obtained from participants were (SD = ) on MRS, to possess FRS (SD = clover dating-datingwebsite ). Based on MRS and you can FRS mediocre, members got negative perceptions of the relations with mothers. Brand new indicate rating of CRS (M = , SD = ) indicated that players had higher level out of conflict resolution habits.
Analyses revealed that mothers’ education level, elementary school education only, F = 9.07, p<.003, high school education only, F = , p<.001, university degree only, F = , p<.004 was significant predictors of adolescents' perceptions of their relations with mathers. In order to find the best model that explains perceived mothers-adolescents relations, stepwise regression analysis was completed in three steps. In first step, elementary school graduation only accounted for 15 % of total variances of perceived mothers-adolescents relations. In the second step of the analysis, high school education which had been contributed to 5.7 % previously to the explained variance was included. In the third step of the analysis, university degree which had contributed to the explained variance 2.5 % was included. The educational levels of mothers accounted for 15 % of total variances of perceieved mothers-adolescents relations. One way analysis of variance indicated that there was significant differences in adolescents' perception with their relation with mother according to the level of mothers' education, F = , p<.001. A posthoc Tukey test was carried out to compare the average of groups. Adolesents whose mothers with elementary school graduation only perceived more positively than adolesents having mothers with high school and university graduation. (p<.01).
This type of effect was basically in keeping with associated books exhibiting the end result regarding social-social factor such as for example educational number of mothers into moms and dads-kids interactions (Hortacsu, Oral, Yasak-Gultekin, 1991; Kinloch, 2001). In the event that informative quantity of moms and dads increase, kids understand their relation that have parents adversely. Just like the mothers with a high academic level could have more and highest expectation compared to the parents having reasonable knowledge peak, this may lead distress inside the parents-adolesents connections and may even consequences one to teens features negative thinking in the their relationships having mothers.
Eryuksel, A beneficial. Akun, Age. (2003). Depreyonu olna ergenler ile anne babalarinin aile iliflkilerinin ve biliflsel carpitmaladnin incelenmesi (Family members and cognitive distortions into the depressive adolescent as well as their moms and dads). Turk Psikooji Dergisi, 18, 59-79.