The newest relationship anywhere between wellness exposure practices and you may intimate direction one of a good school-based attempt out of adolescents

Garofalo, R., Wolf, R. C., Kessel, S., Palfrey, J., & Durant, R. H. (1998). Pediatrics, 101 (5), 895-902. doi: /peds.101.5.895

Doorways, G. J. (2008). Range certainly same-intercourse couples and their students. When you look at the S. Coontz (Ed.) American Family members: A great Multicultural Viewer, New york, NY: Routledge.

GenIUSS Class. (2014). Recommendations having Asking Issues to identify Transgender or other Intercourse Fraction Participants to your People-Dependent Surveys. La, CA: Brand new Williams Institute.

Goldman, R. (1996). Who’s you to definitely queer? Examining norms to sex, race, and you may category inside queer principle. When you look at the B. Beemyn & M. Eliason (Eds), Queer Education: A good Lesbian, Homosexual, Bisexual, and you will Transgender Anthology (pp. 169-182). Nyc, Nyc : New york University Press.

Give, J. Meters., Mottet, L. An excellent., Tanis, J., Herman, J. L., Harrison, J., & Keisling, Meters. (2010). National Transgender Discrimination Questionnaire Summary of Health insurance and Medical care. Retrieved out-of

Green, R. J., Bettinger, Yards., & Zacks, E. (1996). Is actually lesbian partners fused and you may gay male partners disengaged? Inside the J. Laird & R. J. Green (Eds.), Lesbians and you may gays during the partners and you can family members: A manual getting therapists (pp. 185-230). Bay area, Ca : Jossey-Trout.

Federal Center getting Transgender Equivalence and you may Federal Lgbt Task Force, Arizona, DC

Harkless, L. Age., & Fowers, B. J. (2005). Similarities and variations in relational limits certainly one of heterosexuals, homosexual people, and you may lesbians. Psychology of females Every quarter, 30 (2), 167-176. xdoi: /j.1471-nine.x

Haseldon, L. & Joloza, T. (2009). Computing intimate direction: Helpful information having scientists. Newport, Southern area Wales, UK: Place of work to have National Analytics.

Herek, G. Yards. (1996). Why determine if you are not requested? Self-disclosure, intergroup get in touch with, and you may heterosexuals’ thinking into the lesbians and you will gay boys. When you look at the G. M. Herek, J. B. Jobe, & R. Yards. Carney (Eds.), Call at push: Sexual orientation and the military (pp. 197-225). il, IL: College out-of Chi town Press.

Herek, G. Meters. Kimmel, D. C., Amaro, H., & Melton, G. B. (1991). To avoid heterosexual prejudice for the emotional search. American Psychologist, 46 (9), 957-963.

Institute of Medicine. (2011). The condition of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and you can Transgender People: Building a foundation to own most readily useful facts. Arizona, DC: The latest Federal Academies Force.

Suit some one 2010: Mate document to possess lesbian, gay, bisexual, and you may transgender (LGBT) wellness

Institute out-of Treatments. (2013). Get together sexual orientation and you will gender term research inside the digital health information: Working area summation. Washington, DC: The latest National Academies Push.

Laumann, Elizabeth. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, Roentgen. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The newest social team regarding sex: Sexual strategies in the us. Chicago, IL : School off il Press.

Lee, J. (1996). Why Suzie Wong is not an excellent lesbian: Far eastern and you can Far eastern American lesbian and you may bisexual lady and you will femme/butch/sex identities. Within the B. Beemyn & M. Eliason (Eds.), Queer studies: A beneficial lesbian, homosexual, bisexual & transgender anthology (pp. 115-132). New york, NY: Nyc University Push.

Absolutely nothing, Roentgen. J. Good., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with lost research (2nd ed.). Nyc, NY: Wiley.

). Psychological state correlates off recognized discrimination among lesbian, gay, and you can bisexual people in the usa. American Journal off Societal Wellness, 91 (11), 1869-1876. doi: /AJPH.

Mikalson, P.; Pardo, S.; Eco-friendly, J. (2012). Very first, Manage No Damage: Reducing Disparities for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Curious Communities when you look at the Ca. Work environment away from Wellness Guarantee, Ca Institution out of Personal Wellness. Retrieved regarding

Nadal, K. L., & Corpus, Yards. J. H. (2012). “Tomboys” and “Baklas”: Skills out-of lesbian and you may gay Filipino People in the us. Asian Western Journal regarding Mindset, 4 (3), 166-175. doi: /a0030168

Nardi, P. Meters., & Sherrod, D. http://besthookupwebsites.org/local-hookup/canberra (1994). Relationship regarding life away from homosexual boys and you may lesbians. Log from Social and personal Matchmaking, 11 (2) 185- 199. doi: 407594112002